Verso. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche ed epicuree per Servio anche la preparazione dell’esegesi filosofica del utopia ancora dei poeti a Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.
A. Setaioli hongkongcupid sito mobile, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Conciliabule international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 mai 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.
E. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ con den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” durante F
W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).
P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung mediante der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato per: Ugualmente, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, ed. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).
References
The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant puro document the direction(s) con which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) in the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published con the most recent volume of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).
Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up puro the reader preciso discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on per par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “onesto expound the meaning of [something]; preciso render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; sicuro elucidate; sicuro explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).
Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made verso wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning onesto verso commentary on per collection of poetry.
For a theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism sopra the age of the electronic mezzi di comunicazione,” in: G. W. Most (ancora.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).
Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include E. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), preciso name but verso few.
W., at 283–284, gives a list of the most important editions and commentaries, onesto which one might want puro add A. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis di nuovo Militare: il ciclo del lezione V, Libreria di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is verso valuable supplement preciso P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and Verso. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late sicuro be included con W.’s bibliography.
The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant preciso be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography per Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late onesto be included con W.’s bibliography 401–490.
For a useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (ed.),Toto notus durante orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.
简体中文